中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 42 Issue 5
May  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Clinical features and multimodal quantitative radiological features of primary liver cancer patients with different traditional Chinese medicine syndrome types

DOI: 10.12449/JCH260514
Research funding:

Hunan Province Science and Technology Talent Support Project-Young Outstanding Science and Technology Worker Training Program (2022TJ-N05);

Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (22B0401);

Changsha Natural Science Foundation (kq2208211);

Hunan Natural Science Foundation (2023JJ30477);

The Project of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Vascular Biology and Translational Medicine (2024XG002);

Hunan Provincial Health Research Project (20256387);

Guiding Project of the “Academician Liu Liang Workstation” (25YS004)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHANG Kun, kun_zhang0102@163.com (ORCID: 0000-0002-2432-1760)
  • Received Date: 2025-11-06
  • Accepted Date: 2026-01-14
  • Published Date: 2026-05-25
  •   Objective  To investigate the association of the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome types of primary liver cancer (PLC) with clinical features and multimodal quantitative radiological features on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to provide a reference for the objectification of TCM syndrome differentiation and precise diagnosis and treatment.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 312 patients who were diagnosed with PLC in The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine from March 2020 to June 2025, and according to the TCM syndrome type, they were divided into stagnation of liver Qi group with 40 patients, stagnation of liver Qi and spleen deficiency group with 109 patients, Qi stagnation and blood stasis group with 62 patients, dampness-heat toxin amassment group with 81 patients, and liver-kidney Yin deficiency group with 20 patients. Clinical features and multimodal quantitative radiological features were compared between the patients with different TCM syndrome types. A one-way analysis of variance was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups, and the least significant difference t-test was used for further comparison between two groups; the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups, and the Dunn’s multiple test was used for further comparison between two groups; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups, and the Bonferroni method was used for further comparison between two groups.  Results  There were significant differences between the patients with different TCM syndrome types in China liver cancer staging (CNLC), Child-Pugh class, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, direct bilirubin, total bilirubin, prothrombin time, neutrophil, and albumin-bilirubin score (all P<0.05). In the stagnation of liver Qi group, the patients with Child-Pugh class A accounted for 75.00%; among the patients with CNLC stage I PLC, the patients with stagnation of liver Qi accounted for 60.00%, and those with Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome accounted for 59.68%, while among the patients with CNLC stage IV PLC, the distribution proportion of dampness-heat toxin amassment (27.16%) and liver-kidney Yin deficiency (30.00%) was significantly higher than that of stagnation of liver Qi (2.50%) (all P<0.05). Radiological examination showed that there were significant differences between the patients with different TCM syndrome types in the number of tumors, ascites, venous tumor thrombus, maximum tumor diameter, intrahepatic metastasis, and lymph node metastasis in the hepatic hilar and retroperitoneal regions (all P<0.05). Compared with the patients with stagnation of liver Qi, the patients with liver depression and spleen deficiency or liver-kidney Yin deficiency were more likely to develop intrahepatic metastasis; the patients with liver depression and spleen deficiency, dampness-heat toxin amassment, or liver-kidney Yin deficiency were more likely to develop lymph node metastasis in the hepatic hilar and retroperitoneal regions; the patients with liver-kidney Yin deficiency were more likely to experience multiple tumors; the patients with liver depression and spleen deficiency or dampness-heat toxin amassment were more likely to develop ascites (all P<0.05). Compared with the patients with Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome, the patients with liver depression and spleen deficiency had a significantly longer maximum tumor diameter and a significantly higher proportion of patients with venous tumor thrombus (both P<0.05). Furthermore, among the 184 patients with MRI diffusion-weighted imaging sequences, the patients with dampness-heat toxin amassment or Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome had significantly higher ADC values and relative ADC values than those with stagnation of liver Qi (all P<0.05).  Conclusion  There are significant differences in CT/MRI radiological features and clinical features between PLC patients with different TCM syndrome types, among whom the patients with liver depression and spleen deficiency, dampness-heat toxin amassment, and liver-kidney Yin deficiency tend to exhibit progressive radiological features, and those with dampness-heat toxin amassment or Qi stagnation and blood stasis syndrome tend to have higher ADC values. These findings provide an objective basis for TCM syndrome differentiation in PLC.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2024, 74( 3): 229- 263. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834.
    [2]
    HAN BF, ZHENG RS, ZENG HM, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2024, 4( 1): 47- 53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006.
    [3]
    WANG HB, LU ZM, ZHAO XX. Tumorigenesis, diagnosis, and therapeutic potential of exosomes in liver cancer[J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2019, 12( 1): 133. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-019-0806-6.
    [4]
    BRUIX J, REIG M, SHERMAN M. Evidence-based diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Gastroenterology, 2016, 150( 4): 835- 853. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.12.041.
    [5]
    Alliance of Liver Cancer Conversion Therapy, Committee of Liver Cancer, China Anti-Cancer Association. Chinese expert consensus on conversion and perioperative therapy of primary liver cancer(2024 edition)[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2024, 23( 4): 492- 513. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20240228-00135.

    中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会转化治疗协作组. 原发性肝癌转化及围手术期治疗中国专家共识(2024版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23( 4): 492- 513. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20240228-00135.
    [6]
    HU ZY, YANG QR, ZHOU C, et al. Mechanism of chemotherapy resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma and intervention with Chinese medicine: A review[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae, 2022, 28( 14): 254- 261. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20220923.

    胡泽玉, 杨清瑞, 周铖, 等. 肝癌化疗耐药机制及中药干预研究进展[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2022, 28( 14): 254- 261. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20220923.
    [7]
    GAO XY, HU J, CHEN LW. Application of healthy qi-reinforcing and tonifying Chinese medicines in primary liver cancer: A review[J]. World Chin Med, 2023, 18( 15): 2231- 2236. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2023.15.022.

    高心宇, 胡娟, 陈立武. 扶正补益类中药在原发性肝癌中应用研究进展[J]. 世界中医药, 2023, 18( 15): 2231- 2236. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2023.15.022.
    [8]
    ZHANG XY, GUAN ZY, LI WL, et al. Impact of clinical physicians’ interaction with intelligent platforms in assisting traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment decision-making: A survey[J]. World Chin Med, 2024, 19( 21): 3242- 3246. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2024.21.004.

    张心怡, 关之玥, 李文龙, 等. 临床医师应用智能平台交互辅助中医诊疗的影响调查[J]. 世界中医药, 2024, 19( 21): 3242- 3246. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2024.21.004.
    [9]
    ZHANG K, ZHU L, ZHU KJ. Exploration of the correlation between modern imaging and TCM syndromes and construction of new TCM syndrome imageology[J]. World Chin Med, 2016, 11( 6): 1101- 1104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2016.06.045.

    张堃, 朱璐, 朱克俭. 探索证候与影像相关性, 构建中医证候影像新学科[J]. 世界中医药, 2016, 11( 6): 1101- 1104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7202.2016.06.045.
    [10]
    Korean Liver Cancer Association(KLCA), National Cancer Center(NCC) Korea. 2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol, 2022, 28( 4): 583- 705. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294.
    [11]
    National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer(2024 edition)[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2024, 40( 5): 893- 918. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240508.

    中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2024年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40( 5): 893- 918. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240508.
    [12]
    Branch of Hepatobiliary Diseases, China Association of Chinese Medicine. Guideline for traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2024, 40( 5): 919- 927. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240509.

    中华中医药学会肝胆病分会. 原发性肝癌中医诊疗指南[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40( 5): 919- 927. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240509.
    [13]
    KANG HJ, KIM H, LEE DH, et al. Gadoxetate-enhanced MRI features of proliferative hepatocellular carcinoma are prognostic after surgery[J]. Radiology, 2021, 300( 3): 572- 582. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204352.
    [14]
    CHOI SY, KIM SH, PARK CK, et al. Imaging features of gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging for identifying cytokeratin 19-positive hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective observational study[J]. Radiology, 2018, 286( 3): 897- 908. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162846.
    [15]
    ZHOU B. Research on disease, syndrome and symptom of liver cancer in ancient TCM literature[J]. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med, 2011, 29( 12): 2714- 2716.

    周蓓. 肝癌相关中医病证症的古代文献研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2011, 29( 12): 2714- 2716.
    [16]
    BU JJ, DOU XY, SUN M, et al. Exploring diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer by Chinese medical master ZHOU Zhongying based on compound pathogenesis theory[J]. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med, 2025, 43( 2): 80- 83. DOI: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2025.02.018.

    补娟娟, 豆晓云, 孙萌, 等. 基于复合病机论探讨国医大师周仲瑛原发性肝癌辨治思路[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2025, 43( 2): 80- 83. DOI: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2025.02.018.
    [17]
    HAN H, XU Q, DENG TH, et al. Study on TCM syndrome differentiation and treatment of 1869 cases of primary liver cancer in Hunan Province[J]. Guid J Tradit Chin Med Pharm, 2020, 26( 15): 112- 116. DOI: 10.13862/j.cnki.cn43-1446/r.2020.15.028.

    韩晗, 徐琦, 邓天好, 等. 湖南省1869例原发性肝癌患者的中医证治规律研究[J]. 中医药导报, 2020, 26( 15): 112- 116. DOI: 10.13862/j.cnki.cn43-1446/r.2020.15.028.
    [18]
    SHI ZY, FAN XF, GAO Y, et al. The distribution pattern of traditional Chinese medicine syndromes and influencing factors for primary liver cancer: An analysis of 415 cases[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2025, 41( 1): 84- 91. DOI: 10.12449/JCH250113.

    石智尧, 凡晓菲, 高宇, 等. 415例原发性肝癌中医证候分布规律及影响因素分析[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2025, 41( 1): 84- 91. DOI: 10.12449/JCH250113.
    [19]
    YU ZH, CHEN JB, XU GS, et al. CHAI Kequn's experience in application of four principles and four methods of traditional Chinese medicine in treating liver cancer based on syndrome differentiation[J]. J Tradit Chin Med, 2019, 60( 7): 559- 561. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.07.005.

    余志红, 陈嘉斌, 徐国暑, 等. 柴可群运用中医辨治肿瘤四则四法论治肝癌经验[J]. 中医杂志, 2019, 60( 7): 559- 561. DOI: 10.13288/j.11-2166/r.2019.07.005.
    [20]
    MATOBA M, TONAMI H, KONDOU T, et al. Lung carcinoma: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient[J]. Radiology, 2007, 243( 2): 570- 577. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2432060131.
    [21]
    TARON J, JOHANNINK J, BITZER M, et al. Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging in hepatic tumors and its impact on patient management[J]. Cancer Imag, 2018, 18( 1): 10. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-018-0140-1.
    [22]
    LIU XA, ZHANG YF. Study on the correlation between the TCM syndrome types of primary liver cancer and the imaging manifestations of liver specific contrast agent[J]. Acta Chin Med, 2020, 35( 5): 1093- 1097. DOI: 10.16368/j.issn.1674-8999.2020.05.244.

    刘新爱, 张玉峰. 原发性肝癌的中医证型与肝脏特异性对比剂影像表现相关性研究[J]. 中医学报, 2020, 35( 5): 1093- 1097. DOI: 10.16368/j.issn.1674-8999.2020.05.244.
    [23]
    ZHANG SJ, CHEN Y, SUN BG, et al. Nature of spleen deficiency internal environment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med, 2017, 35( 1): 7- 9. DOI: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2017.01.001.

    张诗军, 陈燕, 孙保国, 等. 肝癌的脾虚内环境本质研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2017, 35( 1): 7- 9. DOI: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2017.01.001.
    [24]
    LUO HX, CHEN Y, SUN BG, et al. Establishment and evaluation of orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma and drug-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in mice with spleen-deficiency syndrome in traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med, 2016, 14( 1): 165- 173. DOI: 10.21010/ajtcam.v14i1.18.
    [25]
    MO ZM, LI P, CHEN QX, et al. Exploring the mechanism of enhanced metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in pi-deficiency state based on exosome miRNA sequencing[J]. Chin J Integr Tradit West Med, 2022, 42( 12): 1476- 1483. DOI: 10.7661/j.cjim.20220921.022.

    莫灼锚, 李攀, 陈秋霞, 等. 基于外泌体miRNA测序探讨肝癌在脾虚状态下转移增强机制[J]. 中国中西医结合杂志, 2022, 42( 12): 1476- 1483. DOI: 10.7661/j.cjim.20220921.022.
    [26]
    ZHANG JN, LIU XA. Correlation between TCM classification of primary liver cancer and MRI imaging manifestations[J]. Chin J Pract Med, 2020, 47( 10): 7- 10. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115689-20200103-00055.

    张瑾宁, 刘新爱. 原发性肝癌的中医分型与MRI影像学表现的相关性研究[J]. 中国实用医刊, 2020, 47( 10): 7- 10. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115689-20200103-00055.
    [27]
    LIN DY, PENG B, ZHENG JH, et al. Value of a logistic regression model based on the clinical features of liver cancer in judging the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome types of primary liver cancer[J]. J Clin Hepatol, 2020, 36( 6): 1293- 1298. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.06.021.

    林栋毅, 彭波, 郑景辉, 等. 基于肝癌临床特征构建的logistic回归模型对原发性肝癌中医证型的判断效能[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2020, 36( 6): 1293- 1298. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2020.06.021.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (32) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return