中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 41 Issue 10
Oct.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Value of body roundness index in predicting the risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

DOI: 10.12449/JCH251015
Research funding:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81904154);

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82205086);

Henan Province Science and Technology Research Program (242102310500);

Special Scientific Research Project on Traditional Chinese Medicine under the “Double First-Class” Initiative in Henan Province (HSRP-DFCTCM-2023-1-10);

Joint Fund of the Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Program (Project of Advantageous Discipline Cultivation) (242301420096);

Joint Fund of the Henan Provincial Science and Technology Research Program (Project of Advantageous Discipline Cultivation) (242301420021);

Traditional Chinese Medicine Inheritance and Innovation Project of Henan Provincial Health Commission (2023ZXZX1162)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: LIU Minghao, liumh015@163.com (ORCID: 0009-0001-7712-4605)
  • Received Date: 2025-04-23
  • Accepted Date: 2025-07-21
  • Published Date: 2025-10-25
  •   Objective  To investigate the association between body roundness index (BRI) and the risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database, as well as the clinical value of BRI as a noninvasive tool for risk prediction.  Methods  Based on the NHANES data in 2015—2020, the 4 573 individuals were divided into MAFLD group with 2 508 individuals and non-MAFLD group with 2 065 individuals, and BRI was calculated for each individual. In order to ensure data quality and reduce the impact of abnormal values on analytical results, the boxplot method was used to remove abnormal levels of BRI and improve the robustness of data. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. The multivariate Logistic regression model was established to investigate the association between BRI and MAFLD. BRI was divided into four groups based on quantiles, and with the first quantile (Q1) as reference, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the other three models. Restricted cubic spline was used to investigate the dose-effect relationship between BRI and MAFLD. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the efficacy of BRI in the diagnosis of MAFLD. The decision curve analysis was used to investigate the potential clinical value of the model in clinical practice. The interaction analysis and the subgroup analysis were performed to investigate the difference in the association between BRI and MAFLD between different populations. The Lasso regression analysis was conducted for the screening and analysis of characteristic variables.  Results  Compared with the non-MAFLD group, the MAFLD group had a significantly higher BRI (Z=36.29, P<0.001). After adjustment for the variables including age, sex, ethnicity, educational level, the proportion of individuals with poor income, marital status, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the fully adjusted Logistic regression model showed that BRI was significantly positively associated with the risk of MAFLD (OR=2.53, 95%CI: 2.28 — 2.80, P<0.001). In addition, the highest BRI quartile (Q4) group had a significantly higher risk of MAFLD than the lowest quartile (Q1) group (OR=83.45, 95%CI: 51.87 — 134.26, P<0.001). The restricted cubic spline analysis further confirmed the significant nonlinear association between BRI and MAFLD (P for nonlinear<0.001). The interaction analysis and the subgroup analysis showed that the interaction between hypertension and BRI had statistical significance (P for interaction=0.003), and compared with the individuals without hypertension, the individuals with hypertension had a stronger association between BRI and MAFLD (OR=1.60, 95%CI: 1.23 — 2.08, P<0.001). The ROC curve analysis showed that the fully adjusted model based on BRI had a strong discriminatory ability in differentiating MAFLD from non-MAFLD, with an AUC of 0.887 (95%CI: 0.877 — 0.896). The decision curve analysis showed that the fully adjusted model had good net benefits within the risk threshold of 0.10 — 0.75, which was commonly used in clinical practice. The model based on the key variables identified by the Lasso regression analysis had an AUC of 0.882 (95%CI: 0.872 — 0.892), which confirmed the robustness of the prediction results.  Conclusion  There is a significant positive correlation between BRI and the risk of MAFLD, with a stronger association observed in the hypertensive population. As a body index reflecting abdominal obesity and visceral fat accumulation, BRI shows promising application prospects in the risk assessment of MAFLD.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ESLAM M, NEWSOME PN, SARIN SK, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement[J]. J Hepatol, 2020, 73( 1): 202- 209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039.
    [2]
    GOFTON C, UPENDRAN Y, ZHENG MH, et al. MAFLD: How is it different from NAFLD[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol, 2023, 29( Suppl): S17- S31. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0367.
    [3]
    WANG YK, WEI SY, LIU C, et al. A new definition of fatty liver disease: from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic associated fatty liver disease[J]. Chin J Dig Surg, 2023, 22( S1): 117- 121. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230909-00080.

    王永康, 魏诗雨, 刘昌, 等. 脂肪性肝病新定义:从非酒精性脂肪性肝病到代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2023, 22( S1): 117- 121. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20230909-00080.
    [4]
    LIM GEH, TANG A, NG CH, et al. An observational data meta-analysis on the differences in prevalence and risk factors between MAFLD vs NAFLD[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 21( 3): 619- 629. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.038.
    [5]
    BAE SDW, GEORGE J, QIAO L. From MAFLD to hepatocellular carcinoma and everything in between[J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2022, 135( 5): 547- 556. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002089.
    [6]
    CHENG YM, KAO JH, WANG CC. The metabolic profiles and body composition of lean metabolic associated fatty liver disease[J]. Hepatol Int, 2021, 15( 2): 405- 412. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-021-10147-0.
    [7]
    HAGSTRÖM H, NASR P, EKSTEDT M, et al. Risk for development of severe liver disease in lean patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A long-term follow-up study[J]. Hepatol Commun, 2017, 2( 1): 48- 57. DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1124.
    [8]
    LEE SW, SON JY, KIM JM, et al. Body fat distribution is more predictive of all-cause mortality than overall adiposity[J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2018, 20( 1): 141- 147. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13050.
    [9]
    THOMAS DM, BREDLAU C, BOSY-WESTPHAL A, et al. Relationships between body roundness with body fat and visceral adipose tissue emerging from a new geometrical model[J]. Obesity(Silver Spring), 2013, 21( 11): 2264- 2271. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20408.
    [10]
    CAI XT, SONG SW, HU JL, et al. Body roundness index improves the predictive value of cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A cohort study[J]. Clin Exp Hypertens, 2023, 45( 1): 2259132. DOI: 10.1080/10641963.2023.2259132.
    [11]
    ZHANG Y, GAO WX, REN R, et al. Body roundness index is related to the low estimated glomerular filtration rate in Chinese population: A cross-sectional study[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2023, 14: 1148662. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148662.
    [12]
    GAO WX, JIN LJ, LI DC, et al. The association between the body roundness index and the risk of colorectal cancer: A cross-sectional study[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2023, 22( 1): 53. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-023-01814-2.
    [13]
    CHUNG TH, KIM JK, KIM JH, et al. Fatty liver index as a simple and useful predictor for 10-year cardiovascular disease risks determined by Framingham risk score in the general Korean population[J]. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2021, 30( 2): 221- 226. DOI: 10.15403/jgld-3404.
    [14]
    HUANG ZM, NG K, CHEN HY, et al. Validation of controlled attenuation parameter measured by FibroScan as a novel surrogate marker for the evaluation of metabolic derangement[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2022, 12: 739875. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.739875.
    [15]
    STEBBINS RC, NOPPERT GA, AIELLO AE, et al. Persistent socioeconomic and racial and ethnic disparities in pathogen burden in the United States, 1999-2014[J]. Epidemiol Infect, 2019, 147: e301. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268819001894.
    [16]
    LIU CF, CHIEN LW. Predictive role of neutrophil-percentage-to-albumin ratio(NPAR) in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and advanced liver fibrosis in nondiabetic US adults: Evidence from NHANES 2017-2018[J]. Nutrients, 2023, 15( 8): 1892. DOI: 10.3390/nu15081892.
    [17]
    MU BS, LIU X, ZHU WY. Application of processing abnormal values in deformation monitoring based on N-standard-deviation method and boxplot method[J]. J Nantong Vocat Univ, 2023, 37( 2): 100- 104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5327.2023.02.022.

    穆宝胜, 刘欣, 朱文艳. 基于n个标准差法和箱线图法识别变形监测中异常值的应用探究[J]. 南通职业大学学报, 2023, 37( 2): 100- 104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5327.2023.02.022.
    [18]
    LI HJ, ZHANG Y, LUO HC, et al. The lipid accumulation product is a powerful tool to diagnose metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in the United States adults[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2022, 13: 977625. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.977625.
    [19]
    JIANG NN, ZHANG SG, CHU JG, et al. Association between body roundness index and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease detected by Fibroscan in America[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2023, 37( 19-20): e24973. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24973.
    [20]
    ZHAO EF, WEN XL, QIU WQ, et al. Association between body roundness index and risk of ultrasound-defined non-alcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 10( 1): e23429. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23429.
    [21]
    MANSOUR A, POURHASSAN S, GERAMI H, et al. Regional fat distribution and hepatic fibrosis and steatosis severity in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes[J]. Obes Sci Pract, 2024, 10( 4): e777. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.777.
    [22]
    TIAN XY, DING N, SU YJ, et al. Comparison of obesity-related indicators for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease diagnosed by transient elastography[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2023, 34( 10): 1078- 1087. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2023.23101.
    [23]
    XIE FF, PEI YY, ZHOU Q, et al. Comparison of obesity-related indices for identifying nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A population-based cross-sectional study in China[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2021, 20( 1): 132. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-021-01560-3.
    [24]
    KHANMOHAMMADI S, FALLAHTAFTI P, HABIBZADEH A, et al. Effectiveness of body roundness index for the prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lipids Health Dis, 2025, 24( 1): 117. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-025-02544-3.
    [25]
    LIU JR, FAN DM, WANG X, et al. Association of two novel adiposity indicators with visceral fat area in type 2 diabetic patients: Novel adiposity indexes for type 2 diabetes[J]. Medicine(Baltimore), 2020, 99( 19): e20046. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020046.
    [26]
    ELGUEZABAL RODELO RG, PORCHIA LM, TORRES-RASGADO E, et al. Visceral and subcutaneous abdominal fat is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease while augmenting Metabolic Syndrome’s effect on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A cross-sectional study of NHANES 2017-2018[J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19( 2): e0298662. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298662.
    [27]
    EMAMAT H, JAMSHIDI A, FARHADI A, et al. The association between the visceral to subcutaneous abdominal fat ratio and the risk of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review[J]. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24( 1): 1827. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19358-0.
    [28]
    KAHN D, MACIAS E, ZARINI S, et al. Exploring visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue secretomes in human obesity: Implications for metabolic disease[J]. Endocrinology, 2022, 163( 11): bqac140. DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqac140.
    [29]
    MOREIRA VC, SILVA CMS, WELKER AF, et al. Visceral adipose tissue influence on health problem development and its relationship with serum biochemical parameters in middle-aged and older adults: A literature review[J]. J Aging Res, 2022, 2022: 8350527. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8350527.
    [30]
    TILG H, IANIRO G, GASBARRINI A, et al. Adipokines: Masterminds of metabolic inflammation[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2025, 25( 4): 250- 265. DOI: 10.1038/s41577-024-01103-8.
    [31]
    LIAO J, QIU MH, LI J, et al. Association of visceral adipose tissue with hypertension: Results from the NHANES 2011-2018 and mendelian randomization analyses[J]. J Clin Hypertens(Greenwich), 2025, 27( 1): e14953. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14953.
    [32]
    SERAVALLE G, GRASSI G. Obesity and hypertension[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2017, 122: 1- 7. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.05.013.
    [33]
    THETHI T, KAMIYAMA M, KOBORI H. The link between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and renal injury in obesity and the metabolic syndrome[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 2012, 14( 2): 160- 169. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-012-0245-z.
    [34]
    SHARIQ OA, MCKENZIE TJ. Obesity-related hypertension: A review of pathophysiology, management, and the role of metabolic surgery[J]. Gland Surg, 2020, 9( 1): 80- 93. DOI: 10.21037/gs.2019.12.03.
    [35]
    GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ A, GÁMEZ-NAVA JI, DÍAZ-DE LA CRUZ EN, et al. The effect of visceral abdominal fat volume on oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokines in subjects with normal weight, overweight and obesity[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes, 2020, 13: 1077- 1087. DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S245494.
    [36]
    LOPERENA R, HARRISON DG. Oxidative stress and hypertensive diseases[J]. Med Clin North Am, 2017, 101( 1): 169- 193. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.08.004.
    [37]
    LOPERENA R, VAN BEUSECUM JP, ITANI HA, et al. Hypertension and increased endothelial mechanical stretch promote monocyte differentiation and activation: Roles of STAT3, interleukin 6 and hydrogen peroxide[J]. Cardiovasc Res, 2018, 114( 11): 1547- 1563. DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvy112.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (60) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return