中文English
ISSN 1001-5256 (Print)
ISSN 2097-3497 (Online)
CN 22-1108/R
Volume 41 Issue 5
May  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Effectiveness of carvedilol alone versus carvedilol combined with endoscopic variceal ligation in secondary prevention of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis

DOI: 10.12449/JCH250515
Research funding:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970533);

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022ZD21)

More Information
  • Corresponding author: ZHANG Chunqing, zhangchunqing_sdu@163.com (ORCID: 0000-0001-8711-1579)
  • Received Date: 2024-09-18
  • Accepted Date: 2024-10-23
  • Published Date: 2025-05-25
  •   Objective  To compare the therapeutic effects of carvedilol alone and carvedilol combined with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in the prevention of re-bleeding from gastroesophageal varices, and to provide strategies for clinical treatment.  Methods  We retrospectively included 178 patients who had received carvedilol alone or carvedilol plus EVL to prevent gastroesophageal variceal re-hemorrhage from October 2010 to June 2023. They were divided into carvedilol alone group (47 cases) and carvedilol+EVL group (131 cases). Between-group comparisons were conducted using the paired t test for normally distributed continuous data, the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed continuous data, and the chi-square test for categorical data. A Cox proportional hazards model was employed for univariable and multi-variable analyses. The cumulative incidence rates of re-bleeding and mortality were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were matched through propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce selection bias and enhance the credibility of causal inference.  Results  The re-bleeding rate of the carvedilol+EVL group was significantly lower than that of the carvedilol alone group (10-year cumulative incidence: 29.8% vs 36.2%, hazard ratio [HR]=0.505, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.292‍ ‍—‍ ‍0.847, P=0.015). There was no significant difference in liver-related mortality (10-year cumulative incidence: 21.3% vs 21.4%, HR=0.799, 95%CI: 0.406‍ ‍—‍ ‍1.578, P=0.518). The results were stable with PSM analysis. The Cox regression analysis revealed that creatinine was an independent risk factor affecting re-bleeding (HR=1.004, 95%CI: 1.001‍ ‍—‍ ‍1.008, P=0.011) and liver-related mortality (HR=1.004, 95%CI: 1.001‍ ‍—‍ ‍1.007, P=0.019).  Conclusion  Carvedilol combined with EVL is better than carvedilol alone in the prevention of gastroesophageal variceal re-bleeding.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    VILLANUEVA C, ALBILLOS A, GENESCÀ J, et al. β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension(PREDESCI): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393( 10181): 1597- 1608. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31875-0.
    [2]
    de FRANCHIS R, BOSCH J, GARCIA-TSAO G, et al. Baveno VII- Renewing consensus in portal hypertension[J]. J Hepatol, 2022, 76( 4): 959- 974. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022.
    [3]
    WANG SN, WANG GC, ZHANG MY, et al. Prevention for rebleeding of esophageal varices under the guidance of hepatic venous pressure gradient[J/OL]. Chin J Dig Med Imageology Electron Ed, 2019, 9( 6): 256- 262. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2019.06.005.

    王思宁, 王广川, 张明艳, 等. 肝静脉压力梯度指导下食管静脉曲张再出血预防方法选择[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2019, 9( 6): 256- 262. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2015.2019.06.005.
    [4]
    REIBERGER T, ULBRICH G, FERLITSCH A, et al. Carvedilol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with haemodynamic non-response to propranolol[J]. Gut, 2013, 62( 11): 1634- 1641. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304038.
    [5]
    ALBILLOS A, KRAG A. Beta-blockers in the era of precision medicine in patients with cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatol, 2023, 78( 4): 866- 872. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.12.005.
    [6]
    KIM SG, KIM TY, SOHN JH, et al. A randomized, multi-center, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy of carvedilol vs. propranolol to reduce portal pressure in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2016, 111( 11): 1582- 1590. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.327.
    [7]
    BAO H, SUO RN. Progress in endoscopic treatment of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage[J]. Int J Dig Dis, 2024, 44( 2): 71- 74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-534X.2024.02.001.

    包涵, 索日娜. 急性食管静脉曲张破裂出血的内镜下治疗进展[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2024, 44( 2): 71- 74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-534X.2024.02.001.
    [8]
    CORTI MC, GAZIANO M, HENNEKENS CH. Iron status and risk of cardiovascular disease[J]. Ann Epidemiol, 1997, 7( 1): 62- 68. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00112-3.
    [9]
    MORALES CASTRO D, DRESSER L, GRANTON J, et al. Pharmacokinetic alterations associated with critical illness[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2023, 62( 2): 209- 220. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-023-01213-x.
    [10]
    PHILIPS BJ, LANE KT, DIXON J, et al. The effects of acute renal failure on drug metabolism[J]. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol, 2014, 10( 1): 11- 23. DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2013.835802.
    [11]
    ALMUKHTAR S. Transforming growth factor-β1 gene polymorphism rs1800471 and end-stage renal disease[J]. Br J Biomed Sci, 2021, 78( 4): 233- 235. DOI: 10.1080/09674845.2021.1908689.
    [12]
    LI L, WAN QS, YANG SK, et al. Impact of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism on chronic renal failure susceptibility[J]. Ther Apher Dial, 2018, 22( 6): 575- 587. DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12714.
    [13]
    MUNGMUNPUNTIPANTIP R, WIWANITKIT V. PDGFRA gene polymorphism and high myopia: Correspondence[J]. Ophthalmic Genet, 2022, 43( 3): 430. DOI: 10.1080/13816810.2022.2068042.
    [14]
    WU ZY, WU ZG, QI HM, et al. Correlation between MRAS gene polymorphism and atherosclerosis[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2020, 24( 10): 5644- 5649. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202005_21355.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (446) PDF downloads(55) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return